Showing posts with label brand extension. Show all posts
Showing posts with label brand extension. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Exclamation Point Marketing!!!!!??

Is it just me or has the marketing profession has lost something in the past few years? Lately it seems to me that hype, promotion and volume have replaced cleverness, innovation and values.

Maybe it was too much Billy Mays yelling at me & now Sully, his smarmy Pitchmen buddy; maybe it is the current US obsession with tabloid journalism and personal desire for celebrity; possibly another casualty of the Wal-Mart effect. I could blame the Internet, video gaming, mobile content, maybe even El Nino. Safe to say, I haven’t determined the root cause, but I do know that brand marketing has lost a bit of luster recently.

Being a brand sensitive individual and one who was raised in the industry to develop, nurture and evangelize the value and critical importance of brands, I must say sometimes I feel a bit lost. We see brand extension after brand extension. Companies that have built great brands and good businesses like Di Giorno sold off for logistics reasons, not marketing issues.

Where, oh where is the customer in all this? It often appears that we have lost sight of their needs, desires and hopes. Or are we just determined to sell them stuff; at low prices? in massive quantities? Maybe that’s what they want and I don’t know it.

I, like so many, look forward to the Super Bowl coming, as much for the half-time entertainment, football and the commercials. This annual seminal moment in TV advertising is analyzed nearly as much as the X’s and O’s. Who is in, who’s out, how much are they spending.

What amazes me about Super Bowl ads (and now advertising in general) is how little the ads even talk about the product, if at all. I wonder if Danica Patrick even knows or cares about what Go Daddy does? More importantly, how many viewers even care. No doubt many young men find out they are a domain listing service, very few who have their own website.

One might excuse Go Daddy, but when such respected marketers as Budweiser airing ads that are never linked to the product, in any way, it hurts. If advertising is merely an attempt to entertain the audience, how effective can it be in shaping image or building awareness, trial and preference? Is it that marketers are just being lazy? Or going for the low hanging fruit? Or are consumers not demanding enough of the brands they upon which they spend?

My experience from 15 years of advertising tells me that some of the brightest and ambitious people - smart, clever, curious, insightful and driven- work in the field of advertising. They cannot be proud of some of the work out there. Advertising can be entertaining AND smart, strategic and on message. The current E*Trade campaign is spot on; funny, resonates with audiences; campaignable and flexible across media, including viral.

It can be done, but it takes a client that demands GREAT work and won’t settle for less!!!

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Starbucks Instant Coffee?!?!?!

Admit it. When you read the title (or saw the article in Ad Age or on the news) you did a double take. It's hard to get your head around the fact that Starbucks is not only entering this category, but have been researching and studying this for 20 years!! Why were they interested in 1989 and my word why introduce it now?

I have long admired Starbucks for their tremendous innovation and progressive marketing approach. In the US they redefined coffee as an
experience and a personal indulgence. Rather than drecky coffee at the diner or off the street cart, Americans were finally able to enjoy premium coffee. But much more it became a happening, a truly experiential brand - comfy chairs, soothing music, free wireless, great coffee aroma, a new exotic language to go along with personal service in building your own customized beverage. Plus a company with values and character that we could respect and actually admire - benefits for ALL employees, a credible corporate position for environmental and fair trade issues and a clear philanthropic approach.

So I'm not sure that I get or understand this latest move. The brand extensions into retail with bagged coffee, bottled frappacinos and ice cream somehow seem less risky to the brand since they were not directly core products and they have greater control over the quality and shopping experience. Even the music and coffee related gadgets all fit.

Admittedly, I haven't tried
Starbucks VIA™ Ready Brew: A Breakthrough in Instant Coffee and after my sample arrives I may be proven wrong. Just a guess, but the act of pouring hot water and dried coffee into a mug and stirring is not the kind of "coffee experience" people associate with Starbucks

Given the general state of the economy, Starbucks recent closure of many stores and layoff of staff, it might be the time to reinvest and support the cornerstone of the franchise.... Not launch a potentially risky and damaging extension.


What do you think? I'd love to hear your thoughts and ideas.



Read the Starbucks announcement here:
http://news.starbucks.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=168