Monday, February 23, 2009

Five Things ALL Sponsors Must Do -- NOW!

Very few people had anticipated the current economic situation, with long term economic and commercial implications remaining uncertain. For sponsorship professionals, this is a time of real challenge and opportunity.

Corporate sponsorships have always been viewed in a certain different light than other marketing investments. Because of the large financial commitments and some ‘squishy’ results reporting, there is potential for them to be lumped into the category of “Corporate Largess & Transparency” along with private jets, large bonuses and executive perks.

It is the role of the managers responsible for these relationships to take charge and be proactive in conducting analysis and report to senior management. Woe to the individual who waits for the cuts to hit them, only to scramble in haste to implement a budget number forced upon them.

In light of the cut backs announced at many leading properties and announcements of corporate partners ending or shrinking their relationships, the value of a deal signed years ago may be markedly less, as leagues end expansion plans; new venues are slowed or halted and properties cut staff.

There are several fundamental, yet critical actions that should be undertaken, if you have not already done so. Sophisticated sponsorship marketers regularly complete these steps, but if you have not, now is an especially important time to be prepared and ready to discuss the rationale, value and contribution of the sponsorship portfolio.



  1. Understand the 2009 corporate and brand strategies, objectives and tactical plans.
    1. Have priorities shifted?
    2. What are the key metrics and targets?
    3. How is the activation budget impacted?
    4. What is the likelihood of success?

  1. Review your sponsorship portfolio relative to the new strategies, economic order, customer mood and investor sentiment
    1. How does the current sponsorship portfolio and plan match up?
    2. Are changes needed to realign with the revised priorities?
    3. Where would you invest or cut spending?

  1. Review all sponsor agreements for:
    1. Assets
    2. Deliverables
    3. Options to renegotiate or exit

  1. Schedule a meeting with senior representatives of each property relationship, for a direct, frank and open conversation:
    1. Corporate or brand plans, target audience change and channel or retailer impacts of economy.
    2. Ask about the impacts and changes for the property – growth or investment plans, resources and assets

  1. Develop a sponsorship plan and recommendation for marketing or brand executives
    1. Updated activation plans, budget, measurement plan and projected results for investment spending
    2. Property relationships for maintenance spending
    3. Properties targeted that should be ended

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Starbucks Instant Coffee?!?!?!

Admit it. When you read the title (or saw the article in Ad Age or on the news) you did a double take. It's hard to get your head around the fact that Starbucks is not only entering this category, but have been researching and studying this for 20 years!! Why were they interested in 1989 and my word why introduce it now?

I have long admired Starbucks for their tremendous innovation and progressive marketing approach. In the US they redefined coffee as an
experience and a personal indulgence. Rather than drecky coffee at the diner or off the street cart, Americans were finally able to enjoy premium coffee. But much more it became a happening, a truly experiential brand - comfy chairs, soothing music, free wireless, great coffee aroma, a new exotic language to go along with personal service in building your own customized beverage. Plus a company with values and character that we could respect and actually admire - benefits for ALL employees, a credible corporate position for environmental and fair trade issues and a clear philanthropic approach.

So I'm not sure that I get or understand this latest move. The brand extensions into retail with bagged coffee, bottled frappacinos and ice cream somehow seem less risky to the brand since they were not directly core products and they have greater control over the quality and shopping experience. Even the music and coffee related gadgets all fit.

Admittedly, I haven't tried
Starbucks VIA™ Ready Brew: A Breakthrough in Instant Coffee and after my sample arrives I may be proven wrong. Just a guess, but the act of pouring hot water and dried coffee into a mug and stirring is not the kind of "coffee experience" people associate with Starbucks

Given the general state of the economy, Starbucks recent closure of many stores and layoff of staff, it might be the time to reinvest and support the cornerstone of the franchise.... Not launch a potentially risky and damaging extension.


What do you think? I'd love to hear your thoughts and ideas.



Read the Starbucks announcement here:
http://news.starbucks.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=168